US Foods provides customers with digital tools for viewing invoices, credits, and payment information, but it does not publicly guarantee that every account receives Net 30, Net 60, or Net 90 terms. Payment schedules and credit conditions are generally established through each customer’s approved account agreement. For foodservice suppliers that want to extend similar flexibility to their own buyers, a modern net terms platform can support credit decisions, invoice advances, payment processing, reconciliation, and collections while helping protect working capital.
US Foods is a major foodservice distributor serving restaurants, healthcare organizations, hospitality businesses, and other foodservice operators. Customers can access invoices and credits through the company’s MOXē platform, which supports centralized invoice visibility and bill payment management.
However, US Foods does not publish a universal payment schedule stating that all customers receive Net 30, Net 60, or Net 90. A customer’s actual due date may depend on its credit approval, account agreement, location, purchasing relationship, payment method, and other commercial conditions.
This distinction is important. A supplier should not assume that a large distributor gives every buyer the same terms or that its own customers will expect identical arrangements. Businesses comparing their credit policies with US Foods should focus on the broader model: approved commercial buyers may receive invoicing and payment arrangements based on account-specific terms.
Foodservice suppliers commonly use several payment structures:
These structures should be written clearly on the invoice and in the underlying customer agreement. The agreement should specify when the payment period begins, which payment methods are accepted, whether late charges may apply, and how disputes will be handled.
Foodservice businesses often operate with frequent deliveries, changing order volumes, seasonal demand, and narrow operating margins. Flexible terms can help an approved buyer purchase inventory before revenue from those goods has been collected.
For a restaurant, caterer, hotel, or institutional kitchen, this timing can make ordering more manageable. For the supplier, it can strengthen customer relationships and support repeat purchasing.
Trade credit also creates a financial obligation for the seller. Once an invoice is issued, the supplier may have to wait weeks for payment while continuing to cover:
Longer terms generally create a larger gap between making a sale and receiving the cash. When customers pay after the agreed due date, that gap becomes even more difficult to manage.
A company offering Net 60 effectively finances the buyer’s purchase for up to two months. During that period, the invoice remains in accounts receivable rather than becoming available cash.
As receivables grow, a supplier may have less cash available for replenishing stock, hiring employees, maintaining delivery vehicles, or accepting larger orders. This is why payment terms should be treated as a credit decision rather than simply a sales incentive.
A sound program should balance three goals:
Credit evaluation helps determine whether a customer should receive terms, how long those terms should be, and how much the customer should be permitted to owe.
The process does not need to be identical for every customer. A small initial order may require a lighter review than a high-value account requesting a substantial revolving credit line.
Begin by confirming that the applicant is a legitimate operating business. Useful information may include:
The NACM credit study recommends collecting basic company information, verifying legitimacy through official databases, and documenting the applicable credit and payment terms.
The depth of the review should match the potential exposure. Credit teams may examine:
In the NACM survey, half of respondents identified credit bureau reports as their most important source for assessing credit risk. Trade references and financial statements were also commonly used.
No single data source provides a complete answer. Strong underwriting combines multiple signals and considers whether the requested credit limit is appropriate for the buyer’s size, payment history, and financial condition.
Fraud prevention should be part of customer onboarding, especially when applications are submitted online.
The 2024 findings showed that 64% of surveyed organizations viewed fraud as the biggest hurdle to conducting business online. The report also identified invoice fraud, identity theft, payment diversion, and procurement fraud as risks affecting B2B trade.
Practical controls can include:
A credit decision should not be based solely on the information supplied in an application.
A written policy gives sales, finance, and operations teams consistent rules for approving and managing customers.
A credit limit defines the maximum outstanding balance a customer may carry. It should reflect the buyer’s financial strength, expected order volume, and payment history.
New customers may begin with a smaller limit. The business can then increase the limit after the customer demonstrates reliable payment behavior.
Limits should also be reviewed when:
The NACM survey found that 33% of credit professionals reviewed limits only after receiving a risk signal, while 49% performed annual reassessments. A more responsive policy can combine scheduled reviews with event-based monitoring.
Not every customer should receive the longest available payment period.
A seller might use:
The purpose is not to make approval unnecessarily difficult. It is to align each customer’s purchasing flexibility with the amount of risk the seller can reasonably accept.
The customer agreement and invoice should clearly identify:
Clear documentation reduces misunderstandings and gives the collections team a consistent basis for follow-up.
Approving a customer is only the beginning of the credit lifecycle. Sellers also need to deliver accurate invoices, track due dates, reconcile incoming payments, and respond quickly when an account becomes overdue.
An invoice should be issued as soon as the applicable goods or services have been delivered. Delays in invoicing extend the effective payment cycle before the customer’s formal payment period has even begun.
Each invoice should include:
The seller should also confirm that the invoice was delivered to the correct person or system. An otherwise valid invoice may remain unpaid simply because it entered the wrong approval workflow.
An AR automation platform can reduce repetitive work by synchronizing invoice data, sending reminders, recording payment activity, and supporting reconciliation.
Useful automation capabilities include:
Automation does not eliminate the need for human judgment. Finance teams still need to manage disputes, maintain customer relationships, and decide when an account requires different terms. It does, however, make routine receivables work more consistent.
Collections should begin with professional, factual communication. A typical workflow may progress from a reminder to direct outreach and then to a formal account review.
A graduated process can include:
Resolve Pay’s automated collections tools can support structured follow-up while keeping the seller’s team informed.
Terms such as 2/10 Net 30 allow a buyer to deduct 2% when paying within 10 days, with the full invoice due on day 30 if the discount is not taken.
The annualized value of paying 20 days early under this structure is approximately 37%, based on the mathematical relationship between the discount and the shortened payment period. The exact economic benefit depends on the buyer’s available cash, borrowing costs, and alternative uses for those funds.
For sellers, an early payment discount can accelerate cash collection, but it also reduces revenue on each discounted invoice. Before using this approach, a business should compare the discount with:
Early payment programs work best when invoice approval and payment processes are fast enough to meet the discount deadline.
Resolve Pay is a B2B payments and net terms platform designed for merchants, manufacturers, wholesalers, and distributors that want to offer flexible credit while improving receivables operations.
Instead of relying on disconnected credit, financing, payment, and collection processes, sellers can manage these workflows through one platform.
Resolve Pay’s business credit checks combine business information, credit data, behavioral signals, and credit expertise to support approval decisions.
Credit lines and advance amounts are not guaranteed. They depend on buyer verification, underwriting, transaction eligibility, and the applicable program agreement.
For eligible approved invoices, Resolve Pay can provide a non-recourse advance while the buyer pays according to its approved terms. Resolve Pay’s materials state that advances may reach up to 100% for qualifying invoices, although actual advance rates vary by buyer and transaction.
Non-recourse protection applies to approved, valid, non-disputed invoices under the program terms. It should not be interpreted as coverage for fraud, misrepresentation, contractual disputes, returns, or invoices that do not meet eligibility requirements.
Resolve Pay supports credit, invoicing, payments, reconciliation, reminders, and collections. Buyers can use a branded payment portal with options such as ACH, wire, card, or check.
The platform also provides financial system integrations with QuickBooks Online, Xero, Oracle NetSuite, and Sage Intacct. Ecommerce integrations include Shopify, BigCommerce, Magento 2, and WooCommerce, with API options available for additional systems.
This connectivity can help sellers keep customer, invoice, payment, and receivables information aligned without replacing their accounting or ERP system of record.
Foodservice suppliers should not assume that US Foods offers one standard payment schedule to every customer. Public information confirms that US Foods provides invoice and payment management tools, but specific credit limits, due dates, and account conditions depend on the customer’s approved agreement.
Businesses that want to offer their own buyers flexible terms need a structured process for verification, underwriting, limit setting, invoicing, monitoring, and collections. Managing these responsibilities manually becomes more difficult as customer volume and receivables grow.
Resolve Pay brings these functions together through B2B net terms, credit decisioning, eligible non-recourse invoice advances, payments, AR automation, and system integrations. This allows qualified sellers to provide approved buyers with useful payment flexibility while strengthening cash flow visibility and reducing manual receivables work.
US Foods does not publicly guarantee a standard Net 30, Net 60, or Net 90 schedule for every customer. Actual due dates and credit conditions may depend on the customer’s approval, account agreement, location, purchasing relationship, and payment arrangements. Customers should review their invoices or contact their US Foods representative for their specific terms.
Yes. Resolve Pay supports approved net terms, including common extended payment periods, while managing credit decisions and receivables workflows. Eligibility, credit limits, terms, and invoice advance amounts are determined through underwriting and program conditions.
For an eligible, approved, valid, and non-disputed invoice, Resolve Pay may advance funds to the seller and assume approved buyer credit risk under the applicable agreement. Non-recourse treatment does not generally cover fraud, misrepresentation, returns, contractual disputes, or ineligible invoices.
The decision should consider business verification, credit reports, payment history, financial information, order size, industry conditions, and the seller’s risk tolerance. A seller should also set a credit limit and review the account periodically rather than relying only on the original approval.
Resolve Pay lists integrations with QuickBooks Online, Xero, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Shopify, BigCommerce, Magento 2, and WooCommerce. Flexible API options can support additional ecommerce, ERP, and order management workflows.
This post is to be used for informational purposes only and does not constitute formal legal, business, or tax advice. Each person should consult his or her own attorney, business advisor, or tax advisor with respect to matters referenced in this post. Resolve assumes no liability for actions taken in reliance upon the information contained herein.